Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

unclear if produced streams are directly compatible with vanilla brotli #1

Open
jyrkialakuijala opened this issue Nov 22, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@jyrkialakuijala
Copy link

Particularly: is the 32 substreams index table within a brotli comment block.

Dr. Mark Adler foresaw this kind of extensions and demanded that we add a possibility to add comment blocks that will be skipped by the normal decoder. If the index table is the only incompatibility (not clear from the spec if it is even an incompatibility by itself), it could perhaps be nicer for compatibility if the index table could be placed within a comment block.

I'm available to discuss this in a VC if there is interest.

@kikaxa
Copy link

kikaxa commented Jan 4, 2023

i checked it and contrary to the claims ive seen on it being compatible, regular brotli does not accept it

brotli -d F.ktx.brotlig 
input file [F.ktx.brotlig] suffix mismatch

brotli -d F.ktx.brotlig.br 
corrupt input [F.ktx.brotlig.br]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants