[Proposal] Hazard event location

[odscrachel]

What is your proposed change?

To create a new event.geographic_coverage field within the event object that sits within the hazard component. The field will have the following attributes

Title	Field name	Description	Type
Event location	event.geographic_coverage	The names of the geographic areas covered by the event in the modelled scenario(s).	array of strings

What is the context or reason for the change?

This replaces event_set.geo_area from rdl-schema_0_1.json. It was reasoned that this should be at event level e.g. for the same event_set, multiple locations (events) can be modelled. Spreadsheet link

[matamadio]

This would be different from top-level subnational_coverage, which gives the summary of all locations (as list).

• subnational_coverage (Location1_name, Location2_name)
  • hazard.event_set.event1.geographic_coverage (Location1_name)
  • hazard.event_set.event2.geographic_coverage (Location2_name)

[duncandewhurst]

I think that our modelling and naming conventions for spatial/geographic coverage at the event level should be consistent with our approach at the dataset level. Suggest that we agree the dataset modelling first in #52 and then update this issue.

[stufraser1]

Proposal agreed in #52, so moving to agreed and ready.

[odscjen]

updated in schema by #121