Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Linear operator for clear sky MW inconsistent w/ GSI's #424

Open
rtodling opened this issue Sep 13, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Linear operator for clear sky MW inconsistent w/ GSI's #424

rtodling opened this issue Sep 13, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@rtodling
Copy link
Contributor

rtodling commented Sep 13, 2024

I am working to add T-skin as a CV to JEDI just as it is in GSI. All works now and an initial attempt reveals that the MW operator in JEDI does not process the sensitivity to skin (land) temperature the same way as GSI's.

Here is a plot of the comparison (w/ a multiplier factor of 2 for visual enhancement: as usual GSI (top) JEDI(bot). This is a case when only ATMS-N20 observations are used in both systems.

ts_inc_due_to_atmsn20

Notice also the increment over Antartica that is not present in JEDI's.

@rtodling
Copy link
Contributor Author

I believe the above is associated with the settings in the linear operator of MW (clear sky) that presently read:

      Surfaces:
      - Water_Temperature

I believe the consistent settings would be something like:

      Surfaces:
      - Water_Temperature
      - Land_Temperature
      - Ice_Temperature
      - Snow_Temperature

@rtodling
Copy link
Contributor Author

rtodling commented Sep 13, 2024

Just to provide a piecemeal illustration here is what happens w/ the comparison when Land_Temperature (only) is added to the present settings - so that JEDI uses:

Surfaces:
- Water_Temperature
- Land_Temperature
ts_inc_due_to_atmsn20_land

Now the land impact shows up in JEDI's increment ... but we still miss the Antartica increment.

@rtodling
Copy link
Contributor Author

Now interestingly, when all four surfaces (Water, Land, Ice, and Snow) are passed to the linear observation operator, there are still no increments over Antartica ... the reason for this might be a missing sensitivity in UFO ... will look.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant