You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 22, 2021. It is now read-only.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Some feeds (such as streaming news sites) publish hundreds of articles per day. In one month, thousands of articles can be reached. To avoid stocking too many articles, you can set the limit of the number of days to keep the articles very low. But other feeds, such as blogs, publish more rarely and often the articles are much longer. So if you set a very low day limit, you risk losing these articles if you don't read them right away. So you have to choose between potentially keeping a huge number of items or losing some of them.
Describe the solution you'd like
In other aggregators, instead of determining a limit of days, you can just define a maximum number of items to keep. It seems to me to be a very good alternative!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
🚀 Feature
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Some feeds (such as streaming news sites) publish hundreds of articles per day. In one month, thousands of articles can be reached. To avoid stocking too many articles, you can set the limit of the number of days to keep the articles very low. But other feeds, such as blogs, publish more rarely and often the articles are much longer. So if you set a very low day limit, you risk losing these articles if you don't read them right away. So you have to choose between potentially keeping a huge number of items or losing some of them.
Describe the solution you'd like
In other aggregators, instead of determining a limit of days, you can just define a maximum number of items to keep. It seems to me to be a very good alternative!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: