You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There is a "codescikit-learn==1.3.0" in requirements.txt. Is it a typo?
Could you kindly point me to the webpage for "codescikit-learn"?
I could not find it on pypi. No such repo on gitee or github. Only three repos on github have it in requirements.txt. There was not much luck on Google either.
Btw, the dependencies require python==3.9. Please include it in the readme so that future users experience fewer trials and errors. Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you for bringing this to our attention. The inclusion of "codescikit-learn==1.3.0" in the requirements.txt file seems to be a mistake or a typo. As you rightly pointed out, there isn't any package named "codescikit-learn" available on PyPI or other repositories.
Regarding the Python version dependency, we appreciate your suggestion. We'll make sure to update the README file to specify the required Python version as Python 3.9 to assist future users and minimize any confusion or potential errors during setup.
I've marked the issue's labels as document, if you're committed to participating in the community open source, thank you for submitting a PR, we'll merge your code to the main branch after reviewing it, and again, thank you for contributing your efforts to the community.
If you have any other questions or need further assistance, please feel free to ask.
There is a "codescikit-learn==1.3.0" in requirements.txt. Is it a typo?
Could you kindly point me to the webpage for "codescikit-learn"?
I could not find it on pypi. No such repo on gitee or github. Only three repos on github have it in requirements.txt. There was not much luck on Google either.
Btw, the dependencies require python==3.9. Please include it in the readme so that future users experience fewer trials and errors. Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: