You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am going to need to use AGPLV3with my project, since I am using https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics which is under AGPLV3. This project looks perfect to me, and I would like to contribute.
First, I would want to add #43. It is GPL compatible which should make it easy to fill in the table.
Secondly, I think some lines in the matrix are wrong for AGPL:
AGPL Should be compatible with itself, currently it is not.
Since AGPL is compatible with GPLV3+, it should also be compatible with ZOTO.
I think separating out Apache V1 and Apache V2 would also be useful, since that is a compatibility problem. But use of Apache V1 is very limited so probably not needed
"The Free Software Foundation considers all versions of the Apache License to be incompatible with the previous GPL versions 1 and 2.[2] Furthermore, it considers Apache License versions before 2.0 incompatible with GPLv3"
I am happy to add all these changes in a PR. Being able to choose the license in the CLI to use for the project would also be a nice touch I can add. Thanks!
Thanks in advance,
Adam
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you so much for creating the issue, and your interest in the repo/ project :)
PRs are absolutely welcome! Usually I'd suggest splitting the features over a few PRs but am very happy to review them all together if that's something you're happy with?
Hey,
I am going to need to use AGPLV3with my project, since I am using https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics which is under AGPLV3. This project looks perfect to me, and I would like to contribute.
First, I would want to add #43. It is GPL compatible which should make it easy to fill in the table.
Secondly, I think some lines in the matrix are wrong for AGPL:
I think separating out Apache V1 and Apache V2 would also be useful, since that is a compatibility problem. But use of Apache V1 is very limited so probably not needed
From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_License
I am happy to add all these changes in a PR. Being able to choose the license in the CLI to use for the project would also be a nice touch I can add. Thanks!
Thanks in advance,
Adam
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: