Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

♻️ Heatmap filematching is way too complicated and should be simplified #2

Open
1 of 2 tasks
shnizzedy opened this issue Aug 8, 2022 · 0 comments
Open
1 of 2 tasks
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@shnizzedy
Copy link
Member

shnizzedy commented Aug 8, 2022

…and better match any intermediates / cross-software / cross-version matches that we care to keep tabs on

Related problem

  • The heatmap scripts are super-specific to C-PAC:fmriprep-options vs. fMRIPrep
  • Comparing outputs and intermediates is otherwise manual and piecemeal

Proposed feature

  1. Script takes two outputs paths and figures out which software was used to generate the outputs, and which depth the script needs as the root
  2. Script looks for matches and skips any non-matching outputs

Acceptance criteria

  • Script takes two outputs paths and figures out which software was used to generate the outputs, and which depth the script needs as the root
  • Script looks for matches and skips any non-matching outputs

Alternatives

No response

Additional context

No response

@shnizzedy shnizzedy changed the title This / this is all way too complicated and should be simplified and better match any intermediates that we care to keep tabs on ♻️ Heatmap filematching is way too complicated and should be simplified Aug 8, 2022
@shnizzedy shnizzedy transferred this issue from FCP-INDI/C-PAC Aug 8, 2022
@shnizzedy shnizzedy self-assigned this Aug 8, 2022
shnizzedy pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 2, 2022
♻️ Update `dct_diff` to handle nested config & importability
shnizzedy pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 13, 2023
♻️ Update `dct_diff` to handle nested config & importability
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant