You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I wrote a cleanup script that among other things merges all GO terms to their respective main ids (some GO terms have multiple synonymous ids listed as alt_ids in the OBO file) which uncovers some additional duplicates (genes annotated with GO terms X and Y even though they mean the same thing). This seems to affect only a very minor part of the annotations (in the case of wheat 177 annotations, that's 0.014 %).
Nevertheless, as a systematic question: Should we include this cleanup step into the pipeline itself?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I wrote a cleanup script that among other things merges all GO terms to their respective main ids (some GO terms have multiple synonymous ids listed as alt_ids in the OBO file) which uncovers some additional duplicates (genes annotated with GO terms X and Y even though they mean the same thing). This seems to affect only a very minor part of the annotations (in the case of wheat 177 annotations, that's 0.014 %).
Nevertheless, as a systematic question: Should we include this cleanup step into the pipeline itself?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: