We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
master
Run example_adaptation. Damages: 230 rows Losses 228 rows
These lines are missing in the losses output
The same amount of lines (with matching IDs) should be returned, identical to the IDs of the input (simplified graph used in losses)
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
These statement in losses_base.py cause the 2 rows to get lost:
losses_base.py
if "key" in criticality_analysis.columns: criticality_analysis = criticality_analysis.drop_duplicates( ["u", "v", "key"] ) else: criticality_analysis = criticality_analysis.drop_duplicates(["u", "v"])
This is because some rows have identical u,v(,key).
Sorry, something went wrong.
@sahand-asgarpour could you indicate what the right behavior would be?
drop_duplicates
No branches or pull requests
Ra2ce version checks
master
here.Reproducible example
Run example_adaptation.
Damages: 230 rows
Losses 228 rows
Current behaviour
These lines are missing in the losses output
Desired behaviour
The same amount of lines (with matching IDs) should be returned, identical to the IDs of the input (simplified graph used in losses)
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: