You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Nearly all returned features for listings with the Apartment style type return Nan for nearly all features including: list price, beds, full_baths, sqft, year_built, etc.. This doesn't occur for every Apartment style listing, some do return features with filled values but the majority are NaN.
see example of the proportion of NaN values for each style type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yeah I figured it could be an issue with the data source, I was able to find the listings that returned Nan on realtor.com and all the data is there, so I'm not sure if it's an issue retrieving it or something else.
Yes I can send a more detailed example when I get home Monday or Tuesday! If I recall it was happening with pretty simple queries with the "for_rent" type and the returned apartments were mostly Nan values. I was primarily looking at San Diego, CA but it was happening for other locations too. I was able to just Google the full address and find the listing on realtor.com with everything there
Nearly all returned features for listings with the Apartment style type return Nan for nearly all features including: list price, beds, full_baths, sqft, year_built, etc.. This doesn't occur for every Apartment style listing, some do return features with filled values but the majority are NaN.
see example of the proportion of NaN values for each style type:
![Screenshot 2024-06-21 225855](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/34584341/341939755-f3c54f2a-0b0f-427f-9c90-234746d0b6d3.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.IYuUG7pFIsg2Ci1h2P5fUVsS--OKDGMZ3bqqZwY498w)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: