Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

hello,Why can't I get the same results as paper with the lidar-2d dataset,is there something wrong? #46

Open
YukioSama opened this issue Jan 1, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@YukioSama
Copy link

No description provided.

@YukioSama YukioSama changed the title hello,Why can't I get the same results as paper with the lidar-2d dataset,it is hello,Why can't I get the same results as paper with the lidar-2d dataset,is there something wrong? Jan 1, 2020
@YukioSama
Copy link
Author

I get much lower results than paper

@zwqnju
Copy link

zwqnju commented Oct 28, 2020

My result was also not as good as the paper.
In the paper, the class-level result is:
Class Precision Recall IOU
Car 66.7 95.4 64.6
Ped 45.2 29.7 21.8
Cyclist 35.7 45.8 25.1

If using the model file in this, the result is:
car:
Pixel-seg: P: 0.656, R: 0.965, IoU: 0.641
pedestrian:
Pixel-seg: P: 0.328, R: 0.290, IoU: 0.182
cyclist:
Pixel-seg: P: 0.314, R: 0.610, IoU: 0.261

However, I trained the model and got the following result on the validation set:
car:
Pixel-seg: P: 0.666, R: 0.960, IoU: 0.648
pedestrian:
Pixel-seg: P: 0.198, R: 0.359, IoU: 0.146
cyclist:
Pixel-seg: P: 0.274, R: 0.611, IoU: 0.233

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants