Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Distance priors for MegaBEAST #38

Closed
kmcquinn opened this issue Aug 20, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

Distance priors for MegaBEAST #38

kmcquinn opened this issue Aug 20, 2019 · 3 comments
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@kmcquinn
Copy link

  • Distance priors need to be flexible enough in MegaBEAST to allow for distance changes of the order a few tenths of a mag (maybe 0.5? more?) in distance modulus.

  • Depending on how distances are fit in BEAST, the prior may simply be an updated best distance value. But, if BEAST is fitting distances based on specific features in a CMD, the input may be an updated zeropoint calibration. For example, if the horizontal branch was used in BEAST, then the zeropoint could be changed (or the uncertainties on the zeropoint). If the TRGB was used, the zeropoint could similarly be changed. If both features are used, then this is more difficult, and may require a re-run of the BEAST?

@karllark
Copy link
Member

I'm not sure I understand how to implement what is being suggested here.
For the distance prior in the megabeast, it is something that will effect all the stars, not just specific parts of the HR diagram.
But plan is to set up the fitting to be able to limit it (if desired) to specific HR diagram region (see #43). Does this address this point?

@karllark karllark added this to the Future milestone Jan 30, 2020
@kmcquinn
Copy link
Author

Perhaps my comment is off-base for how MegaBEAST will do things.

If I were to measure a distance from a CMD, I could fit, for example, the TRGB or the Horizontal Branch. Each of these has its own calibration. Fitting each individually and applying the calibrations can result in slightly different answers. Thus, it is sometimes useful to consider these distances determinations separately (fit from different parts of the CMD).

If MegaBEAST is fitting distances from the full CMD, then my comment can be ignored. Does that help?

@karllark
Copy link
Member

Yes, this helps. I think I will close this issue for now. If once we get the v1.0 of the megabeast running and this is an issue we do need to address, then we can reopen this issue or open another.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants