Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

image API: fails with some width/height with ! #52

Open
eroux opened this issue Dec 10, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

image API: fails with some width/height with ! #52

eroux opened this issue Dec 10, 2020 · 4 comments
Labels
Image API IIIF Image API related issues

Comments

@eroux
Copy link

eroux commented Dec 10, 2020

My understanding of the spec is that https://iiif.archivelab.org/iiif/rashodgson68$1/full/!2000,145/0/default.jpg should always return something (even when the image is smaller than the dimensions), but in that case it's just a 404

@mekarpeles
Copy link
Member

mekarpeles commented Dec 10, 2020

@eroux that's probably true :) possible it's a problem with https://github.com/mekarpeles/iiif2 (may benefit from adding a test case which fails in https://github.com/mekarpeles/iiif2/blob/master/tests/test_iiif.py and creating an issue there). Speaking from a position of honesty, I'm unlikely to have the time to fix this one; happy to review and test a fix.

@glenrobson glenrobson added bug Image API IIIF Image API related issues and removed bug labels Mar 16, 2023
@glenrobson
Copy link
Collaborator

Note the details for this image is here:

https://archive.org/details/rashodgson68

@glenrobson
Copy link
Collaborator

This doesn't seem to work with the Cantaloupe version:

http://213.21.172.25/iiif/2/rashodgson68$1/info.json

could it be a problem with the $ notation... Note this is a multiple page item

@glenrobson
Copy link
Collaborator

glenrobson commented Mar 30, 2023

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Image API IIIF Image API related issues
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants