-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Error when metadata is incomplete #26
Comments
KAWAHARA-souta
added a commit
to KAWAHARA-souta/alma-sbom
that referenced
this issue
Jun 3, 2024
Store 'None' if build-related data is empty
KAWAHARA-souta
pushed a commit
to KAWAHARA-souta/alma-sbom
that referenced
this issue
Aug 27, 2024
When data cannot be retrieved from immudb, or when data for package is missing, if the --rpm-package option was used to specify an rpm package, I made it so that the rpm package is used to supplement the information. The following issues have been partially fixed. - AlmaLinux#42 - AlmaLinux#44 And the following issues have been fixed. - AlmaLinux#26
KAWAHARA-souta
added a commit
to KAWAHARA-souta/alma-sbom
that referenced
this issue
Sep 17, 2024
When data cannot be retrieved from immudb, or when data for package is missing, if the --rpm-package option was used to specify an rpm package, I made it so that the rpm package is used to supplement the information. The following issues have been partially fixed. - AlmaLinux#42 - AlmaLinux#44 And the following issues have been fixed. - AlmaLinux#26
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
When generating SBOMs for some packages, alma-sbom fails with the following error.
Steps to reproduce:
This is what
immudb_metadata
looks like:I imagine that the metadata for some packages is incomplete because they were built with older versions of ALBS. Maybe we should omit missing data from SBOM generation and only fail if NTIA Minimum Elements are missing?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: