You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the process of testing: AllenInstitute/AllenSDK#1695 I discovered what looks to be bug in the visual_behavior implementation for getting a segmentation mask image.
In cell 3 of the gist I try using the visual_behavior method for accessing the segmentation mask image. The resulting mask image looks nothing like the average/max projection images.
In cell 6 of the gist I used only AllenSDK functions to get the segmentation mask image and got saner results.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, it is likely the case that the SDK version does not filter out invalid ROIs.
That said, it looks like the segmentation mask images demonstrated in the gist are far too different for it to be simply an invalid ROI filtering issue. As an example, take a look at the top left corner of both images and you'll see that there does not seem to be any correspondence whatsoever...
FYI: @matchings
In the process of testing: AllenInstitute/AllenSDK#1695 I discovered what looks to be bug in the visual_behavior implementation for getting a
segmentation mask image
.See: https://gist.github.com/njmei/fe219cec20033e9817c89f5853b14692
In cell
3
of the gist I try using the visual_behavior method for accessing thesegmentation mask image
. The resulting mask image looks nothing like the average/max projection images.In cell
6
of the gist I used only AllenSDK functions to get thesegmentation mask image
and got saner results.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: