You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed that there is a problem with pyart.util.columnsect.get_field_location(radar, site_lat, site_lon) function as when we change the precision of lat/lon values, the results are completely wrong means this function doesn't work on high precision lat/lon. not even for two significant digits. for example, if lat=29.48 and lon =-96.15 then it won't give correct and complete profile(only few meters of height can be shown) whereas for 29.4 anf -96.1 it shows complete profile
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
I noticed that there is a problem with pyart.util.columnsect.get_field_location(radar, site_lat, site_lon) function as when we change the precision of lat/lon values, the results are completely wrong means this function doesn't work on high precision lat/lon. not even for two significant digits. for example, if lat=29.48 and lon =-96.15 then it won't give correct and complete profile(only few meters of height can be shown) whereas for 29.4 anf -96.1 it shows complete profile
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions