Missing parameters in NEXRAD level II data #1258
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 4 comments 1 reply
-
@westzhicanchen Thanks for the heads up, I'll take a look. Instrument parameters should populate, so i'll see if something is going wrong in the reader using those example files. I believe for radar_parameters, it seems those are being combined into instrument parameters for other readers: Line 248 in f923551 not seeing it in the nexrad reader itself, I'll do more digging |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
While the core data model in Py-ART is based on CfRadial, not all of the files we read are CfRadial and follow this convention (ex. NEXRAD's data format). The NEXRAD data format is a collection of individual messages, which we parse in the reader written in Py-ART, extracting what instrument parameters are available (ex. nyquist velocity). Taking a look at the NEXRAD data documentation, I do not see these radar parameter fields as one of the fields within the messages. This might be more of a question for the data provider (NOAA). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi everyone, Thank you all for the quick and detailed response. Any chance you would recommend some person/link that I might find useful when reaching out to the data provider NOAA and asking about this? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
You can find the contact us section on the NCEI website, where they listed this email [email protected] |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
While the core data model in Py-ART is based on CfRadial, not all of the files we read are CfRadial and follow this convention (ex. NEXRAD's data format). The NEXRAD data format is a collection of individual messages, which we parse in the reader written in Py-ART, extracting what instrument parameters are available (ex. nyquist velocity).
Taking a look at the NEXRAD data documentation, I do not see these radar parameter fields as one of the fields within the messages. This might be more of a question for the data provider (NOAA).