-
I'm running python3 on a debian 11 system to create plots from SPOL cfradial RHI sector files at various azimuths. They all plot nicely except for the one scan sequence of 2 rhi's at 101 and 281 deg. They are created by scanning the radar up at one azimuth and then over the top into the other azimuth. When I plot the data, only one of the azimuth angles plots correctly. The other one produces a bunch of blank plots. I'm thinking it must be the cfradial files themselves. Would love any advice out there. Here's the plotting portion of my code. I don't see a way to submit a sample cfradial file but that would probably be helpful. ` # create display
` |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 22 comments 15 replies
-
Can you share a sample data file? You can send it to [email protected]! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@srbrodzik - I had a chance to look at this today. Here are some thoughts!
First, I noticed that we need to manually set the scan mode (assuming these are RHIs), although it sounds like there is a bit of a custom scan strategy here? radar = pyart.io.read("cfrad.20220531_080000.424_to_20220531_080047.680_SPOL_PrecipRhi1_RHI.nc")
radar.scan_type = 'rhi' I was able to reproduce the issue here, using the data sent over. Here is a plot at each of the azimuths, using this block of code: cmap_dict = {"DBZ": "pyart_HomeyerRainbow",
"VEL": "pyart_balance",
"ZDR": "pyart_Carbone42",
"RHOHV": "pyart_Carbone42",
"KDP": "pyart_Carbone42",
"PHIDP": "pyart_Carbone42",}
display = pyart.graph.RadarDisplay(radar)
for sweep in range(radar.nsweeps):
for field in cmap_dict.keys():
display.plot(field, sweep, cmap=cmap_dict[field])
plt.ylim(0, 20)
plt.show()
plt.close() Focusing on just the reflectivity field ( It looks like it is having an issue with the second one (281 deg)...
Could you expand on this? What do you mean by "over the top into the other azimuth"? Is this a typical RHI scan? A vertically pointing scan?
I suspect this is the case... maybe it would be helpful to setup a call to chat about this? I know that ya'll are in a very different timezone, so perhaps we could do earlier tomorrow (June 3) early in the morning my time (7:30 AM CDT), which would be 8:30 PM in Taiwan? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Also, here is a plot of the second RHI zoomed out a bit - there appears to be something picked up by the radar, but I am not exactly sure what it is... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks Max.
Let me try your code tomorrow (it's Thursday night around 11pm here right
now) and I'll let you know what I get. I'm not sure why your code shows
data at 101 deg and mine doesn't. Would love to talk it over Friday night
my time, Friday morning your time. We'd have to talk via Signal or
WhatsApp since I currently have a Taiwan phone number. Or we could always
use Zoom. I've set up Signal and WhatsApp to use my US number so you'd
just have to dial that (206-660-0854) to reach me. Or I can set up a Zoom
call and share the link with you.
FYI, this is kind of a weird RHI 'volume'. It goes up at 101 deg (I think
that angle is first but it could be the other way around), stops at the
top, spins the dish around and then comes down at 281 deg. We're doing
this because there's another radar to the east and this is the line from
one radar to the other. The second radar will do some similar scans so we
can compare data.
Stacy
…On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 11:08 PM Max Grover ***@***.***> wrote:
Also, here is a plot of the second RHI zoomed out a bit - there appears to
be something picked up by the radar, but I am not exactly sure what it is...
[image: Screen Shot 2022-06-02 at 10 05 30 AM]
<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/26660300/171660751-d5ff9cb1-1c0e-487d-8a26-d6f4d27a0d77.png>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1165 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABHT7FU6IOCEFRMTT4AULXLVNDE5VANCNFSM5XQN7L7A>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Great! Sounds good - I will send you a calendar invite for Zoom to the email you used to send the data file. I looped through the different sweeps, so perhaps the sweep number was set to 1 when you tried it? Here is the full script if you want to copy/paste and give it a try. Looking forward to chatting. import pyart
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
radar = pyart.io.read("cfrad.20220531_080000.424_to_20220531_080047.680_SPOL_PrecipRhi1_RHI.nc")
radar.scan_type = 'rhi'
cmap_dict = {"DBZ": "pyart_HomeyerRainbow",
"VEL": "pyart_balance",
"ZDR": "pyart_Carbone42",
"RHOHV": "pyart_Carbone42",
"KDP": "pyart_Carbone42",
"PHIDP": "pyart_Carbone42",}
display = pyart.graph.RadarDisplay(radar)
for sweep in range(radar.nsweeps):
for field in cmap_dict.keys():
display.plot(field, sweep, cmap=cmap_dict[field])
plt.ylim(0, 20)
plt.show()
plt.close() |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks for the help. I'll check the sweep index in my code when I get to
the Ops Center. I hope it's not something that stupid:-)
…On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 11:24 PM Max Grover ***@***.***> wrote:
Great! Sounds good - I will send you a calendar invite for Zoom to the
email you used to send the data file. I looped through the different
sweeps, so perhaps the sweep number was set to 1 when you tried it? Here is
the full script if you want to copy/paste and give it a try. Looking
forward to chatting.
import pyartimport matplotlib.pyplot as plt
radar = pyart.io.read("cfrad.20220531_080000.424_to_20220531_080047.680_SPOL_PrecipRhi1_RHI.nc")radar.scan_type = 'rhi'
cmap_dict = {"DBZ": "pyart_HomeyerRainbow",
"VEL": "pyart_balance",
"ZDR": "pyart_Carbone42",
"RHOHV": "pyart_Carbone42",
"KDP": "pyart_Carbone42",
"PHIDP": "pyart_Carbone42",}display = pyart.graph.RadarDisplay(radar)for sweep in range(radar.nsweeps):
for field in cmap_dict.keys():
display.plot(field, sweep, cmap=cmap_dict[field])
plt.ylim(0, 20)
plt.show()
plt.close()
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1165 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABHT7FQN7KB6KTINMNUKYNDVNDG3FANCNFSM5XQN7L7A>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi Max,
OK, your snippet of code worked for me so I added things from my code to it
until I discovered the problem. I was putting in xlim = (0,150) but for
this particular angle in this particular scanning sequence, I needed to set
xlim = (-150,0).
Guess we don't need to chat about this tonight. Thanks for your
willingness to help me figure this out. I really appreciate it.
I'm sure I'll be in touch down the road.
Stacy
…On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 3:26 PM Stacy Brodzik ***@***.***> wrote:
Thanks for the help. I'll check the sweep index in my code when I get to
the Ops Center. I hope it's not something that stupid:-)
On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 11:24 PM Max Grover ***@***.***>
wrote:
> Great! Sounds good - I will send you a calendar invite for Zoom to the
> email you used to send the data file. I looped through the different
> sweeps, so perhaps the sweep number was set to 1 when you tried it? Here is
> the full script if you want to copy/paste and give it a try. Looking
> forward to chatting.
>
> import pyartimport matplotlib.pyplot as plt
> radar = pyart.io.read("cfrad.20220531_080000.424_to_20220531_080047.680_SPOL_PrecipRhi1_RHI.nc")radar.scan_type = 'rhi'
> cmap_dict = {"DBZ": "pyart_HomeyerRainbow",
> "VEL": "pyart_balance",
> "ZDR": "pyart_Carbone42",
> "RHOHV": "pyart_Carbone42",
> "KDP": "pyart_Carbone42",
> "PHIDP": "pyart_Carbone42",}display = pyart.graph.RadarDisplay(radar)for sweep in range(radar.nsweeps):
> for field in cmap_dict.keys():
> display.plot(field, sweep, cmap=cmap_dict[field])
> plt.ylim(0, 20)
> plt.show()
> plt.close()
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#1165 (comment)>,
> or unsubscribe
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABHT7FQN7KB6KTINMNUKYNDVNDG3FANCNFSM5XQN7L7A>
> .
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
> ***@***.***>
>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I found another data oddness. If you need me to submit this formally via
github, I'll do that. If not, here's the story.
We're collecting a different kind of rhi volume that has 12 widely-spaced
azimuths that range from 0 to 360. They all plot up nicely except the 270
deg azimuth scan which has some artifacts above the radar. I used your
code snippet to do the plotting and added a couple things so I could tell
one plot from the next.
I thought it might be the cfradial file but the NCAR CIDD software displays
these 270 deg angle rhi's without any artifacts. See the image called
'spol.202206030411.rhi_270_cidd.png'.
Everything is attached. Let me know if you have any thoughts. You'll
probably need to take a look through this so I don't expect to talk about
it tonight. Just take your time and let me know what you find. If we need
to chat at that point, we can set something up.
Thanks for your help. I really appreciate it especially during this field
work.
Stacy
cfrad.20220603_040943.316_to_20220603_041149.93...
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Ij1gccjsSCk6m2ExkdKE5G72KROf0-n5/view?usp=drive_web>
…On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 6:45 AM Stacy Brodzik ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi Max,
OK, your snippet of code worked for me so I added things from my code to
it until I discovered the problem. I was putting in xlim = (0,150) but for
this particular angle in this particular scanning sequence, I needed to set
xlim = (-150,0).
Guess we don't need to chat about this tonight. Thanks for your
willingness to help me figure this out. I really appreciate it.
I'm sure I'll be in touch down the road.
Stacy
On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 3:26 PM Stacy Brodzik ***@***.***> wrote:
> Thanks for the help. I'll check the sweep index in my code when I get to
> the Ops Center. I hope it's not something that stupid:-)
>
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 11:24 PM Max Grover ***@***.***>
> wrote:
>
>> Great! Sounds good - I will send you a calendar invite for Zoom to the
>> email you used to send the data file. I looped through the different
>> sweeps, so perhaps the sweep number was set to 1 when you tried it? Here is
>> the full script if you want to copy/paste and give it a try. Looking
>> forward to chatting.
>>
>> import pyartimport matplotlib.pyplot as plt
>> radar = pyart.io.read("cfrad.20220531_080000.424_to_20220531_080047.680_SPOL_PrecipRhi1_RHI.nc")radar.scan_type = 'rhi'
>> cmap_dict = {"DBZ": "pyart_HomeyerRainbow",
>> "VEL": "pyart_balance",
>> "ZDR": "pyart_Carbone42",
>> "RHOHV": "pyart_Carbone42",
>> "KDP": "pyart_Carbone42",
>> "PHIDP": "pyart_Carbone42",}display = pyart.graph.RadarDisplay(radar)for sweep in range(radar.nsweeps):
>> for field in cmap_dict.keys():
>> display.plot(field, sweep, cmap=cmap_dict[field])
>> plt.ylim(0, 20)
>> plt.show()
>> plt.close()
>>
>> —
>> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
>> <#1165 (comment)>,
>> or unsubscribe
>> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABHT7FQN7KB6KTINMNUKYNDVNDG3FANCNFSM5XQN7L7A>
>> .
>> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
>> ***@***.***>
>>
>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@srbrodzik coming back to this - it looks like it is a data quality issue. There are some parts of the 270 degree RHI that have not been flagged to be as "antenna transition" (specifically the last radials) Using the following manually added in the missing transition flags, but without doing this, there is a "rogue radial" in the top left of the plot causing the issues. Before fixing the transition data: After fixing the transition data: And here was the code I used to correct it: import pyart
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
# Read in the data and specify rhi scan type
radar = pyart.io.read("cfrad.20220603_040943.316_to_20220603_041149.938_SPOL_PrecipRhi2_RHI.nc")
radar.scan_type = 'rhi'
# Extract the 270 degree rhi which is where the issue is at
subset = radar.extract_sweeps([8])
# Pull out the transition data
trans = subset.antenna_transition["data"]
# Make sure the last four radials are excluded flagged as in transition (1 = in transition)
trans[-4:] = [1, 1, 1, 1]
# Assign the new values back to the radar
subset.antenna_transition["data"] = trans
# Plot the corrected data
cmap_dict = {"DBZ": "pyart_HomeyerRainbow",
"VEL": "pyart_balance",
"ZDR": "pyart_Carbone42",
"RHOHV": "pyart_Carbone42",
"KDP": "pyart_Carbone42",
"PHIDP": "pyart_Carbone42",}
display = pyart.graph.RadarDisplay(subset)
for sweep in range(subset.nsweeps):
for field in list(cmap_dict.keys()):
display.plot_rhi(field, sweep, cmap=cmap_dict[field])
plt.show()
plt.close() One question for you @srbrodzik - do you mind if we write this up as a blog post? As a debugging case study? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@srbrodzik - can you try updating Py-ART? We cut a new release last week, that should solve this problem. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Yes - the latest version 1.12.4, available on either condaf-forge or pip!
…On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 4:53 PM srbrodzik ***@***.***> wrote:
Just to verify, is the latest version 1.12.4??
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1166 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGLM3TCUL3SC3IIJYB42SPLVO6UXJANCNFSM5YGZ6FSQ>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks Max.
…On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 2:28 PM Max Grover ***@***.***> wrote:
I added a more robust solution to this issue in #1185
<#1185> - we needed more logic with
how to calculate the radius from the radar near 270 degrees since some
values are negative and some are positive (they should all be positive in
this case). Once that is merged and we add a new release, you will be able
to use that!
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1166 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABHT7FXUB4FM43T4BE4WD6LVQTJG7ANCNFSM5YGZ6FSQ>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Since it's already Friday, I think I'll just wait for the new release next
week. Thanks for all the help.
…On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 1:59 PM Max Grover ***@***.***> wrote:
@srbrodzik <https://github.com/srbrodzik> it will not be fixed from
installing via pip or condo until we cut a new release (which we will
likely do next week). If you are interested in using these fixes before
then, please use the following:
pip install git+https://github.com/ARM-DOE/pyart
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1166 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABHT7FTGCI6IK3XE4X674JDVQYOUVANCNFSM5YGZ6FSQ>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks Max.
…On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 12:23 PM Max Grover ***@***.***> wrote:
@srbrodzik <https://github.com/srbrodzik> - we released a new version
today (1.12.5), which is installable via pip or conda!
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1166 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABHT7FTKYFZFG6KVQTTVIQ3VRNGLRANCNFSM5YGZ6FSQ>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
When do you plan to update the git?
Stacy
…On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 12:23 PM Max Grover ***@***.***> wrote:
@srbrodzik <https://github.com/srbrodzik> - we released a new version
today (1.12.5), which is installable via pip or conda!
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1166 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABHT7FTKYFZFG6KVQTTVIQ3VRNGLRANCNFSM5YGZ6FSQ>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Yes please! That would be great!
…On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 6:13 PM srbrodzik ***@***.***> wrote:
I'm not sure what's going on but even after upgrading to pyart version
1.12.5 the 270 deg plots are still bad.
[image: research Radar_SPOL 20220607233059 rhim_6vars_270]
<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5193622/176560698-08c2b052-8e19-4fba-a4b2-b9c316a46ac2.png>
Should I send you the code and/or cfradial file?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1166 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGLM3TEZWYJ3EZIZOMZ5JLDVRTKARANCNFSM5YGZ6FSQ>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Here's the file:
cfrad.20220607_233059.754_to_20220607_233316.83...
<https://drive.google.com/file/d/18sGJPpjm10UZv0SN1sFF6buSD13uC3QV/view?usp=drive_web>
And the code is attached. It's meant to take input arguments but I have
some commented out inputs labelled 'FOR TESTING' that you can modify and
use.
…On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 5:30 PM Max Grover ***@***.***> wrote:
Yes please! That would be great!
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 6:13 PM srbrodzik ***@***.***> wrote:
> I'm not sure what's going on but even after upgrading to pyart version
> 1.12.5 the 270 deg plots are still bad.
>
> [image: research Radar_SPOL 20220607233059 rhim_6vars_270]
> <
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5193622/176560698-08c2b052-8e19-4fba-a4b2-b9c316a46ac2.png
>
>
> Should I send you the code and/or cfradial file?
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <
#1166 (reply in thread)
>,
> or unsubscribe
> <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGLM3TEZWYJ3EZIZOMZ5JLDVRTKARANCNFSM5YGZ6FSQ
>
> .
> You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
> ***@***.***>
>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1166 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABHT7FQHUZXEV26XNGIZOFTVRTTATANCNFSM5YGZ6FSQ>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
-->A general “fix sweep” method would be a nice PR From: Kai Mühlbauer ***@***.***>Date: Thursday, June 30, 2022 at 4:49 AMTo: ARM-DOE/pyart ***@***.***>Cc: Subscribed ***@***.***>Subject: Re: [ARM-DOE/pyart] plotting rhi's created with over the top scanning mode (Discussion #1166)That's most likely another manifestation of bad transition flags. A robust method for flagging those rays would be needed.—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
That is odd. As I told you I thought I had v1.12.5 installed. I can try
this again but will likely get the same (bad) results.
Can you tell me what routine(s) in pyart you modified to create v 1.12.5?
I can then send you the version of that routine that we have installed and
you can verify (or not) that I have the right version installed.
…On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 5:36 AM Max Grover ***@***.***> wrote:
Can you check to see which version of Py-ART is running in your script? I
tried reproducing the issue using the data file you sent along, and ended
up getting the plot to work correctly.
print(pyart.__version__)
Here is the script I used which produced the following plots:
import pyartimport matplotlib.pyplot as plt
radar = pyart.io.read("cfrad.20220607_233059.754_to_20220607_233316.834_SPOL_PrecipRhi2_RHI.nc")
radar.scan_type = "rhi"cmap_dict = {"DBZ": "pyart_HomeyerRainbow",
"VEL": "pyart_balance",
"ZDR": "pyart_Carbone42",
"RHOHV": "pyart_Carbone42",
"KDP": "pyart_Carbone42",
"PHIDP": "pyart_Carbone42",}display = pyart.graph.RadarDisplay(radar)for sweep in range(radar.nsweeps):
print(sweep)
display.plot("DBZ", sweep, cmap=cmap_dict["DBZ"])
plt.ylim(0, 15)
plt.xlim(0 , 100)
plt.show()
plt.close()
[image: Screen Shot 2022-06-30 at 7 34 53 AM]
<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/26660300/176678264-740ee674-dbfe-4f2a-8055-df7f30c4977b.png>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1166 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABHT7FS4C7EJ5GRHMOZ4LWLVRWIGFANCNFSM5YGZ6FSQ>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'm not using conda. We have a centralized python package manager on our
Debian systems at UW and use either select to install or some version of
apt. That's why I was asking which routine was modified so that I can look
in /usr/local to see if that's what we have.
I was on the road for a couple days but will try again to run the script
you used to successfully get the 270 plot. I'll let you know how it goes.
Stacy
…On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 11:47 AM Max Grover ***@***.***> wrote:
We changed the way R (the radius from the radar) is calculated for RHI
scans https://github.com/ARM-DOE/pyart/pull/1185/files
Can you run conda list and post the output here?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1166 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABHT7FS4KH6KNPJKGJFPAR3VRXTSVANCNFSM5YGZ6FSQ>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
We uninstalled and reinstalled v 1.12.5. That did the trick.
I will test this out on a few more volumes and let you know if I have any
other problems.
I really appreciate all the help.
Stacy
…On Sun, Jul 3, 2022 at 10:35 AM Stacy Brodzik ***@***.***> wrote:
I'm not using conda. We have a centralized python package manager on our
Debian systems at UW and use either select to install or some version of
apt. That's why I was asking which routine was modified so that I can look
in /usr/local to see if that's what we have.
I was on the road for a couple days but will try again to run the script
you used to successfully get the 270 plot. I'll let you know how it goes.
Stacy
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 11:47 AM Max Grover ***@***.***>
wrote:
> We changed the way R (the radius from the radar) is calculated for RHI
> scans https://github.com/ARM-DOE/pyart/pull/1185/files
>
> Can you run conda list and post the output here?
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#1166 (reply in thread)>,
> or unsubscribe
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABHT7FS4KH6KNPJKGJFPAR3VRXTSVANCNFSM5YGZ6FSQ>
> .
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
> ***@***.***>
>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I just wanted to make sure you had made the new release available on
github. I've looked there and see that it is. You can disregard my
question.
Stacy
…On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 11:09 AM Max Grover ***@***.***> wrote:
What do you mean by update the git?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1166 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABHT7FWRTJA7K7LVVDVB7D3VRSGPLANCNFSM5YGZ6FSQ>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Great! Sounds good - I will send you a calendar invite for Zoom to the email you used to send the data file. I looped through the different sweeps, so perhaps the sweep number was set to 1 when you tried it? Here is the full script if you want to copy/paste and give it a try. Looking forward to chatting.