-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for Aerial Measurements (UAS, Aircraft, TBS) #774
Comments
From Sid: segment information on what was happening in the flight. Need flight nodes to denote those periods. Can look at 1 minute averages
|
As @sgupta92 mentioned, defining periods of flight to allow for easier QA/QC or analysis of specific flight portions is typically done for every flight campaign and an utility to automatically do this for given input parameters would be beneficial to the community. Typically this requires a 'summary' file, or a file created that contains necessary physical parameters (typically not housekeeping) from every instrument of interest to define the atmospheric environment. Therefore, two modules would be needed:
|
Maybe this could even be as easy as if the user is working with an AAF tagged file (e.g. |
With identified flight segments, eventually utilities such as normalization of cloud parameters for cloud thickness (ZN) (Gupta et al. 2021) could be developed or spatial averages (e.g. avg 1km ND) for level flight legs to directly compare against model/satellite |
Along these lines, to improve and develop interactions between ARM and the satellite community, something that would go a long long way is co-location of ground obs/flight tracks with satellite overpasses. Satellite tracks are automated and available somewhere, then its just a matter of spatial co-location. But having that done already would remove a giant barrier when it comes to ARM data being used by anyone who uses satellite data. |
Potential data source: https://www.iagos.org/ |
Investigate different methods for QA/QC as applied to aerial data along with improved visualizations that could be incorporated into ACT in support of aerial data.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: