ACCESS-ESM1.5: QA Tests

[CodeGat]

Add QA tests for ACCESS-ESM1.5 to the model-config-tests package. Requires bump to 0.0.3 when merged.

In this PR:

• Move all test_*_config.py files into new qa directory
• Added test_access_esm1p5_config.py - see ACCESS-ESM1.5 testing #21 (comment)
• Added access_esm1p5 QA pytest marker
• Bumped version to 0.0.3

Closes #21

Pinging @jo-basevi so she can follow along on my progress 😄

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 52.00000% with 36 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 73.58%. Comparing base (a14002a) to head (d859828).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files	Patch %	Lines
...model_config_tests/qa/test_access_esm1p5_config.py	50.00%	36 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #41      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   76.29%   73.58%   -2.71%     
==========================================
  Files          15       15              
  Lines         658      723      +65     
==========================================
+ Hits          502      532      +30     
- Misses        156      191      +35     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[CodeGat]

Note access-esm1.5-configs will require a (not yet released 0.0.3 model-config-tests package to function due to ACCESS-NRI/access-esm1.5-configs@d37311a

[CodeGat]

Might need a bit of a sanity check on the use of parameterization in the pytests.
The code coverage is also failing...Do I need to make tests for my tests...?

[CodeGat]

Tested this on Gadi with ACCESS-NRI/access-esm1.5-configs@9191fd9 pre-industrial configuration. A bunch of errors because no metadata.yaml, and the failures seem expected. Might need to check the relevance of the 'configs' test marker tests...
Also still don't know what to do with the code coverage for the tests themselves...

[aidanheerdegen]

Soz, a couple of changes and some questions/comments.

[aidanheerdegen]

LGTM!

[aidanheerdegen]

I'll approve, but if you think we should make the changes to the module use path now, then feel free to do so and ask for yet another review

model-config-tests/src/model_config_tests/qa/test_config.py

Line 26 in bdfb85f

RELEASE_MODULE_LOCATION = "/g/data/vk83/modules/access-models"

[aidanheerdegen]

LG(reat)TM

[aidanheerdegen]

Nice catch.